Djibouti vs Guatemala: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Djibouti
0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.1243 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Djibouti rank
158th
Guatemala rank
161st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Djibouti
  • Guatemala
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1243 metric tons per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0131 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 158th and Guatemala ranks 161st of 216 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0216 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0219 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.0108 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0364 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0256 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.012 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.0175 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0835 metric tons per square kilometre 0.066 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.049 metric tons per square kilometre 0.209 metric tons per square kilometre 0.16 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0865 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1708 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0843 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.1258 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1318 metric tons per square kilometre 0.006 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Djibouti or Guatemala?
Djibouti, at 0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1243 metric tons per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Djibouti and Guatemala?
0.0131 metric tons per square kilometre, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Guatemala rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Djibouti ranks 158th and Guatemala ranks 161st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Guatemala: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/guatemala/">Djibouti vs Guatemala: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.