Djibouti vs Kuwait: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Djibouti
0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait
0.158 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Djibouti rank
158th
Kuwait rank
155th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Djibouti
  • Kuwait
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 0.158 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0206 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kuwait ahead.

Djibouti ranks 158th and Kuwait ranks 155th of 216 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0216 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2245 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2029 metric tons per square kilometre Kuwait
1970s 0.0108 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2977 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2869 metric tons per square kilometre Kuwait
1980s 0.017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.428 metric tons per square kilometre 0.411 metric tons per square kilometre Kuwait
1990s 0.0175 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3955 metric tons per square kilometre 0.378 metric tons per square kilometre Kuwait
2000s 0.049 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2856 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2366 metric tons per square kilometre Kuwait
2010s 0.0865 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2309 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1445 metric tons per square kilometre Kuwait
2020s 0.1258 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1588 metric tons per square kilometre 0.033 metric tons per square kilometre Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Djibouti or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at 0.158 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Djibouti and Kuwait?
0.0206 metric tons per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kuwait?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Kuwait rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Djibouti ranks 158th and Kuwait ranks 155th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Kuwait: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/kuwait/">Djibouti vs Kuwait: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.