Djibouti vs Nepal: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Djibouti
0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.1465 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Djibouti rank
158th
Nepal rank
157th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Djibouti
  • Nepal
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.1465 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0091 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 158th and Nepal ranks 157th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0216 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0115 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0101 metric tons per square kilometre Djibouti
1970s 0.0108 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0143 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0035 metric tons per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0.017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0287 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0117 metric tons per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.0175 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0627 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0452 metric tons per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 0.049 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1348 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0858 metric tons per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 0.0865 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1489 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0624 metric tons per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 0.1258 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1465 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0207 metric tons per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Djibouti or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.1465 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1374 metric tons per square kilometre in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Djibouti and Nepal?
0.0091 metric tons per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Nepal rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Djibouti ranks 158th and Nepal ranks 157th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Nepal: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/nepal/">Djibouti vs Nepal: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.