Dominica vs Mauritania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Dominica
0.692 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
100th
Mauritania rank
102nd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Mauritania
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.692 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0485 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 100th and Mauritania ranks 102nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7407 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7134 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1970s 1.1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0382 metric tons per square kilometre 1.07 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 1.17 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0641 metric tons per square kilometre 1.11 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0688 metric tons per square kilometre 1.11 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9631 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 1.03 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5142 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 0.5413 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6811 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1398 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Dominica or Mauritania?
Dominica, at 0.692 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Dominica and Mauritania?
0.0485 metric tons per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Mauritania rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 100th and Mauritania ranks 102nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Mauritania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/dominica/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/dominica/mauritania/">Dominica vs Mauritania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.