Dominica vs Pakistan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Dominica
0.692 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.6616 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
100th
Pakistan rank
101st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Pakistan
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.692 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6616 metric tons per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0304 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 100th and Pakistan ranks 101st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 6 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7407 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1465 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5943 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1970s 1.1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2588 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8457 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 1.17 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4542 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7176 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6999 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4825 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6496 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5062 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 1.03 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6375 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3957 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 0.5413 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6482 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1069 metric tons per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Dominica or Pakistan?
Dominica, at 0.692 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6616 metric tons per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Dominica and Pakistan?
0.0304 metric tons per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Pakistan rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 100th and Pakistan ranks 101st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Pakistan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/dominica/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/dominica/pakistan/">Dominica vs Pakistan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.