Ecuador vs Sierra Leone: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Ecuador
2.8 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
2.87 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
56th
Sierra Leone rank
55th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sierra Leone
01234196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 2.87 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.8 metric tons per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.07 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Ecuador ranks 56th and Sierra Leone ranks 55th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1887 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3913 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2026 metric tons per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1970s 0.9951 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7478 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2473 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 2.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7115 metric tons per square kilometre 1.81 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 1.49 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8961 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5978 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 1.85 metric tons per square kilometre 1.78 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0751 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 2.31 metric tons per square kilometre 2.81 metric tons per square kilometre 0.495 metric tons per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 2.9 metric tons per square kilometre 2.87 metric tons per square kilometre 0.036 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 2.87 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.8 metric tons per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Sierra Leone?
0.07 metric tons per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sierra Leone?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sierra Leone rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 56th and Sierra Leone ranks 55th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sierra Leone: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sierra-leone/">Ecuador vs Sierra Leone: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.