Egypt vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Egypt
0.4262 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
126th
East Timor rank
123rd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • East Timor
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4262 metric tons per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.0104 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 126th and East Timor ranks 123rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 6 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0948 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0948 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.0877 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0877 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.1658 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1658 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.3323 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0229 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3095 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 0.394 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2357 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1582 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 0.3654 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2988 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0666 metric tons per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 0.4288 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4389 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0101 metric tons per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Egypt or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4262 metric tons per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Egypt and East Timor?
0.0104 metric tons per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and East Timor rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 126th and East Timor ranks 123rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/timor-leste/">Egypt vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.