Eswatini vs Jordan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
204th
Jordan rank
201st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Jordan
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 2.0 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 204th and Jordan ranks 201st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0048 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0058 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0067 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0073 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0036 metric tons per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Jordan?
Jordan, at 0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Jordan?
0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 204th and Jordan ranks 201st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Jordan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/jordan/">Eswatini vs Jordan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.