Eswatini vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
204th
Lesotho rank
207th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Lesotho
00.0020.0040.006196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.6 times Lesotho's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 204th and Lesotho ranks 207th of 216 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Lesotho?
Eswatini, at 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Lesotho?
0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lesotho?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Lesotho rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 204th and Lesotho ranks 207th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/lesotho/">Eswatini vs Lesotho: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.