Euro area vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Euro area
0.9636 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
17.93 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
11th
Mauritius rank
12th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Euro area
  • Mauritius
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 17.93 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9636 metric tons per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 16.97 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 18.6 times Euro area's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Euro area ahead.

Euro area ranks 11th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Euro area averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 1.66 metric tons per square kilometre 1.49 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1696 metric tons per square kilometre Euro area
1970s 1.71 metric tons per square kilometre 3.26 metric tons per square kilometre 1.55 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 1.65 metric tons per square kilometre 5.88 metric tons per square kilometre 4.23 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 1.52 metric tons per square kilometre 7.73 metric tons per square kilometre 6.21 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 1.35 metric tons per square kilometre 4.67 metric tons per square kilometre 3.32 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 1.21 metric tons per square kilometre 8.33 metric tons per square kilometre 7.12 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 1 metric tons per square kilometre 15.71 metric tons per square kilometre 14.71 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Euro area or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 17.93 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9636 metric tons per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Euro area and Mauritius?
16.97 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Euro area and Mauritius rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Euro area ranks 11th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/mauritius/">Euro area vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.