Finland vs Uruguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Finland
0.4235 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.3834 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
127th
Uruguay rank
130th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.4235 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3834 metric tons per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0401 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 127th and Uruguay ranks 130th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.245 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1276 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.3537 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2953 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0584 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.5223 metric tons per square kilometre 0.781 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2588 metric tons per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7114 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1914 metric tons per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.4789 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6431 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1642 metric tons per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.5697 metric tons per square kilometre 0.388 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1818 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.4424 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3789 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0635 metric tons per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Finland or Uruguay?
Finland, at 0.4235 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3834 metric tons per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Finland and Uruguay?
0.0401 metric tons per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Uruguay rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 127th and Uruguay ranks 130th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Uruguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/finland/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/finland/uruguay/">Finland vs Uruguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.