France vs Greenland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

France
0.8817 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
93rd
Greenland rank
90th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • France
  • Greenland
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.8817 metric tons per square kilometre in France, a difference of 0.0862 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times France's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.

France ranks 93rd and Greenland ranks 90th of 216 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Greenland Difference Ahead
1960s 1.37 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1644 metric tons per square kilometre 1.21 metric tons per square kilometre France
1970s 1.33 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4226 metric tons per square kilometre 0.907 metric tons per square kilometre France
1980s 1.28 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5381 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7462 metric tons per square kilometre France
1990s 1.23 metric tons per square kilometre 0.713 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5196 metric tons per square kilometre France
2000s 1.14 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9243 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2123 metric tons per square kilometre France
2010s 0.9834 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9449 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0385 metric tons per square kilometre France
2020s 0.9327 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9284 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0043 metric tons per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, France or Greenland?
Greenland, at 0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.8817 metric tons per square kilometre in France as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between France and Greenland?
0.0862 metric tons per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Greenland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do France and Greenland rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
France ranks 93rd and Greenland ranks 90th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Greenland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/france/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/france/greenland/">France vs Greenland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.