Gambia vs Philippines: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Gambia
5.48 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
5.76 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
35th
Philippines rank
33rd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Gambia
  • Philippines
02468196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 5.76 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.48 metric tons per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.28 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Gambia ranks 35th and Philippines ranks 33rd of 216 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5786 metric tons per square kilometre 2.18 metric tons per square kilometre 1.6 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
1970s 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre 4.1 metric tons per square kilometre 2.94 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 1.31 metric tons per square kilometre 5.32 metric tons per square kilometre 4.01 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
1990s 2.55 metric tons per square kilometre 6.29 metric tons per square kilometre 3.73 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
2000s 3.71 metric tons per square kilometre 7.57 metric tons per square kilometre 3.85 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 4.94 metric tons per square kilometre 7.09 metric tons per square kilometre 2.15 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 5.28 metric tons per square kilometre 6.08 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8017 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Gambia or Philippines?
Philippines, at 5.76 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.48 metric tons per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Gambia and Philippines?
0.28 metric tons per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Philippines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Philippines rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Gambia ranks 35th and Philippines ranks 33rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Philippines: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/philippines/">Gambia vs Philippines: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.