Germany vs Palestine: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Germany
0.5222 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
0.5411 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
112th
Palestine rank
111th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Germany
  • Palestine
0123196119922023

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.5411 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5222 metric tons per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 0.0189 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 112th and Palestine ranks 111th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 6 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Palestine Difference Ahead
1960s 2.46 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 2.46 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1970s 2.13 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 2.13 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1980s 1.21 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 1.21 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
1990s 0.7167 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2456 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4711 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
2000s 0.7267 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3757 metric tons per square kilometre 0.351 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
2010s 0.7032 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4448 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2584 metric tons per square kilometre Germany
2020s 0.5465 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6963 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1498 metric tons per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Germany or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.5411 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5222 metric tons per square kilometre in Germany as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Germany and Palestine?
0.0189 metric tons per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Palestine?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Germany and Palestine rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Germany ranks 112th and Palestine ranks 111th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Palestine: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/germany/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/germany/west-bank-and-gaza/">Germany vs Palestine: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.