Ghana vs North Korea: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Ghana
1.69 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea
1.73 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
76th
North Korea rank
75th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Ghana
  • North Korea
02468196119922023

How they compare

North Korea currently reports 1.73 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.69 metric tons per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.04 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was North Korea ahead.

Ghana ranks 76th and North Korea ranks 75th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and North Korea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana North Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3344 metric tons per square kilometre 3.27 metric tons per square kilometre 2.93 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1970s 1.06 metric tons per square kilometre 4.97 metric tons per square kilometre 3.91 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 1.29 metric tons per square kilometre 6.99 metric tons per square kilometre 5.7 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 1.81 metric tons per square kilometre 2.7 metric tons per square kilometre 0.895 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 1.68 metric tons per square kilometre 1.71 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
2010s 1.49 metric tons per square kilometre 1.77 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2861 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
2020s 1.74 metric tons per square kilometre 1.73 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0079 metric tons per square kilometre Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Ghana or North Korea?
North Korea, at 1.73 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.69 metric tons per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Ghana and North Korea?
0.04 metric tons per square kilometre, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and North Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and North Korea rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Ghana ranks 76th and North Korea ranks 75th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs North Korea: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ghana/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ghana/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Ghana vs North Korea: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.