Greenland vs Jamaica: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Greenland
0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
1.16 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
90th
Jamaica rank
87th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Greenland
  • Jamaica
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 0.1921 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.2 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Greenland ranks 90th and Jamaica ranks 87th of 216 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1644 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8967 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7323 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.4226 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8949 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4723 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.5381 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8989 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3608 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.713 metric tons per square kilometre 1.85 metric tons per square kilometre 1.13 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.9243 metric tons per square kilometre 1.27 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3417 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.9449 metric tons per square kilometre 1.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5763 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.9284 metric tons per square kilometre 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2528 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Greenland or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9679 metric tons per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Greenland and Jamaica?
0.1921 metric tons per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Jamaica rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Greenland ranks 90th and Jamaica ranks 87th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Jamaica: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/greenland/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/greenland/jamaica/">Greenland vs Jamaica: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.