Honduras vs Suriname: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Honduras
0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.1985 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
151st
Suriname rank
150th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Honduras
  • Suriname
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.1985 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Honduras ranks 151st and Suriname ranks 150th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0326 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0424 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0098 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0564 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0065 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.1349 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0315 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1034 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 0.2185 metric tons per square kilometre 0.09 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1285 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2000s 0.162 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1836 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0216 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.1055 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2351 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1295 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.1754 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1984 metric tons per square kilometre 0.023 metric tons per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Honduras or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.1985 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Honduras and Suriname?
0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Suriname rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Honduras ranks 151st and Suriname ranks 150th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Suriname: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/honduras/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/honduras/suriname/">Honduras vs Suriname: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.