Honduras vs Zambia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Honduras
0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.1593 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
151st
Zambia rank
154th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Honduras
  • Zambia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1593 metric tons per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0264 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Honduras's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Honduras ranks 151st and Zambia ranks 154th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0326 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0492 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.1349 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0803 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0546 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 0.2185 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1173 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2000s 0.162 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1325 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0295 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2010s 0.1055 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1728 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0673 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.1754 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1628 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0126 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Honduras or Zambia?
Honduras, at 0.1857 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1593 metric tons per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Honduras and Zambia?
0.0264 metric tons per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Zambia rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Honduras ranks 151st and Zambia ranks 154th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Zambia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/honduras/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/honduras/zambia/">Honduras vs Zambia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.