Hungary vs Paraguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Hungary
0.0504 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
0.0454 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
177th
Paraguay rank
180th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Hungary
  • Paraguay
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.0504 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0454 metric tons per square kilometre in Paraguay, a difference of 0.005 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 177th and Paraguay ranks 180th of 216 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0839 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 0.0989 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0068 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0922 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 0.1901 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0176 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1725 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 0.0964 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0605 metric tons per square kilometre 0.036 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 0.0783 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0631 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0152 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.0667 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0493 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0174 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 0.0528 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0444 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0084 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Hungary or Paraguay?
Hungary, at 0.0504 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0454 metric tons per square kilometre in Paraguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Hungary and Paraguay?
0.005 metric tons per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Paraguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Paraguay rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 177th and Paraguay ranks 180th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Paraguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/hungary/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/hungary/paraguay/">Hungary vs Paraguay: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.