Iceland vs Low & middle income: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Iceland
14.36 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income
0.8075 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
14th
Low & middle income rank
16th
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time
- Iceland
- Low & middle income
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 14.36 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.8075 metric tons per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 13.55 metric tons per square kilometre.
That makes Iceland's figure about 17.8 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 14th and Low & middle income ranks 16th of 216 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Low & middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.97 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.3085 metric tons per square kilometre | 8.66 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 1970s | 10.7 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.3523 metric tons per square kilometre | 10.34 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 1980s | 14.45 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.4362 metric tons per square kilometre | 14.01 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 1990s | 16.79 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.6529 metric tons per square kilometre | 16.14 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2000s | 16.8 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.781 metric tons per square kilometre | 16.02 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2010s | 12.14 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.8079 metric tons per square kilometre | 11.33 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2020s | 13.19 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.8079 metric tons per square kilometre | 12.39 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Iceland or Low & middle income?
- Iceland, at 14.36 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.8075 metric tons per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
- What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Iceland and Low & middle income?
- 13.55 metric tons per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Low & middle income?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Low & middle income rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
- Iceland ranks 14th and Low & middle income ranks 16th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.