Indonesia vs Samoa: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Indonesia
4.15 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
3.79 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
38th
Samoa rank
40th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • Samoa
012345196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 4.15 metric tons per square kilometre against 3.79 metric tons per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.36 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 38th and Samoa ranks 40th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 5 and Samoa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5433 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2277 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3156 metric tons per square kilometre Indonesia
1970s 0.7117 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3827 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3291 metric tons per square kilometre Indonesia
1980s 1.14 metric tons per square kilometre 1.12 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0238 metric tons per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 1.9 metric tons per square kilometre 1.57 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3357 metric tons per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 2.51 metric tons per square kilometre 3.93 metric tons per square kilometre 1.42 metric tons per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 3.44 metric tons per square kilometre 3.71 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2666 metric tons per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 3.91 metric tons per square kilometre 3.53 metric tons per square kilometre 0.385 metric tons per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Indonesia or Samoa?
Indonesia, at 4.15 metric tons per square kilometre against 3.79 metric tons per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Indonesia and Samoa?
0.36 metric tons per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Samoa rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 38th and Samoa ranks 40th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Samoa: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/samoa/">Indonesia vs Samoa: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.