Jamaica vs New Zealand: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Jamaica
1.16 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.24 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
87th
New Zealand rank
86th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • New Zealand
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.24 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.08 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8967 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1922 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7045 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.8949 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2798 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6152 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.8989 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8126 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0863 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1.85 metric tons per square kilometre 1.89 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0409 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 1.27 metric tons per square kilometre 1.98 metric tons per square kilometre 0.716 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 1.52 metric tons per square kilometre 1.64 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1152 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre 1.31 metric tons per square kilometre 0.132 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Jamaica or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.24 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Jamaica and New Zealand?
0.08 metric tons per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and New Zealand rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 87th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs New Zealand: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/new-zealand/">Jamaica vs New Zealand: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.