Japan vs OECD members: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Japan
8.18 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
0.6755 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
21st
OECD members rank
21st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Japan
  • OECD members
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 8.18 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6755 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 7.5 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 12.1 times OECD members's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 21st and OECD members ranks 21st of 216 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 18.93 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6611 metric tons per square kilometre 18.27 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
1970s 26.3 metric tons per square kilometre 0.853 metric tons per square kilometre 25.45 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
1980s 29.91 metric tons per square kilometre 1.08 metric tons per square kilometre 28.83 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
1990s 19.18 metric tons per square kilometre 1.05 metric tons per square kilometre 18.13 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
2000s 12.6 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8723 metric tons per square kilometre 11.73 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
2010s 9.89 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7365 metric tons per square kilometre 9.15 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
2020s 8.56 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6714 metric tons per square kilometre 7.88 metric tons per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Japan or OECD members?
Japan, at 8.18 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6755 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Japan and OECD members?
7.5 metric tons per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and OECD members?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and OECD members rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Japan ranks 21st and OECD members ranks 21st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs OECD members: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/japan/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/japan/oecd-members/">Japan vs OECD members: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.