Kenya vs Madagascar: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Kenya
0.2319 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
0.2406 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
146th
Madagascar rank
143rd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Kenya
  • Madagascar
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0.2406 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2319 metric tons per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Kenya ranks 146th and Madagascar ranks 143rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 5 and Madagascar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0413 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0804 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0392 metric tons per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 0.0631 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1053 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0422 metric tons per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 0.1808 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1305 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0502 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 0.3319 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1987 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1332 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 0.2706 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2355 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0351 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 0.2797 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2129 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0668 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 0.244 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2124 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0315 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Kenya or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 0.2406 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2319 metric tons per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Kenya and Madagascar?
0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Madagascar rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Kenya ranks 146th and Madagascar ranks 143rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Madagascar: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/kenya/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/kenya/madagascar/">Kenya vs Madagascar: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.