Kiribati vs Maldives: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Kiribati
318 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
539.21 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
6th
Maldives rank
4th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Maldives
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 539.21 metric tons per square kilometre against 318 metric tons per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 221.21 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Maldives's figure about 1.7 times Kiribati's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 6th and Maldives ranks 4th of 216 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Maldives Difference Ahead
1960s 8.09 metric tons per square kilometre 63.37 metric tons per square kilometre 55.28 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
1970s 11.91 metric tons per square kilometre 111.07 metric tons per square kilometre 99.17 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 28.06 metric tons per square kilometre 180.92 metric tons per square kilometre 152.86 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 41.53 metric tons per square kilometre 333.32 metric tons per square kilometre 291.79 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 40.41 metric tons per square kilometre 497.64 metric tons per square kilometre 457.24 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 160.7 metric tons per square kilometre 435.89 metric tons per square kilometre 275.2 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 269.07 metric tons per square kilometre 508.77 metric tons per square kilometre 239.7 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Maldives?
Maldives, at 539.21 metric tons per square kilometre against 318 metric tons per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Maldives?
221.21 metric tons per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Maldives?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Maldives rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 6th and Maldives ranks 4th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Maldives: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/maldives/">Kiribati vs Maldives: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.