North Korea vs Portugal: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

North Korea
1.73 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
1.79 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea rank
75th
Portugal rank
72nd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • North Korea
  • Portugal
2468196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 1.79 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.73 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 0.06 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

North Korea ranks 75th and Portugal ranks 72nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Korea Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 3.27 metric tons per square kilometre 5.94 metric tons per square kilometre 2.68 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 4.97 metric tons per square kilometre 4.25 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7158 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 6.99 metric tons per square kilometre 3.44 metric tons per square kilometre 3.55 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 2.7 metric tons per square kilometre 2.99 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2854 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 1.71 metric tons per square kilometre 2.36 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6452 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 1.77 metric tons per square kilometre 2.12 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3456 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 1.73 metric tons per square kilometre 1.81 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0813 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, North Korea or Portugal?
Portugal, at 1.79 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.73 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between North Korea and Portugal?
0.06 metric tons per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do North Korea and Portugal rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
North Korea ranks 75th and Portugal ranks 72nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Korea vs Portugal: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/portugal/">North Korea vs Portugal: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.