South Korea vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

South Korea
14.2 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
17.93 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea rank
15th
Mauritius rank
12th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • South Korea
  • Mauritius
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 17.93 metric tons per square kilometre against 14.2 metric tons per square kilometre in South Korea, a difference of 3.73 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times South Korea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 15th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 6 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 6 metric tons per square kilometre 1.49 metric tons per square kilometre 4.51 metric tons per square kilometre South Korea
1970s 16.12 metric tons per square kilometre 3.26 metric tons per square kilometre 12.86 metric tons per square kilometre South Korea
1980s 23.47 metric tons per square kilometre 5.88 metric tons per square kilometre 17.59 metric tons per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 23.73 metric tons per square kilometre 7.73 metric tons per square kilometre 16 metric tons per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 18.56 metric tons per square kilometre 4.67 metric tons per square kilometre 13.89 metric tons per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 16.18 metric tons per square kilometre 8.33 metric tons per square kilometre 7.85 metric tons per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 13.86 metric tons per square kilometre 15.71 metric tons per square kilometre 1.85 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, South Korea or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 17.93 metric tons per square kilometre against 14.2 metric tons per square kilometre in South Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between South Korea and Mauritius?
3.73 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Mauritius rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
South Korea ranks 15th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/mauritius/">South Korea vs Mauritius: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.