Libya vs Romania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Libya
0.0188 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0287 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
194th
Romania rank
191st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Romania
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0287 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0188 metric tons per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.5 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Libya ranks 194th and Romania ranks 191st of 216 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1065 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3805 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3782 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.009 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8335 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8245 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1691 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1502 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0243 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0284 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0041 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0187 metric tons per square kilometre 0.035 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0163 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
2020s 0.0184 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0295 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0111 metric tons per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Libya or Romania?
Romania, at 0.0287 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0188 metric tons per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Libya and Romania?
0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Romania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Romania rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 194th and Romania ranks 191st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Romania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/libya/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/libya/romania/">Libya vs Romania: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.