Low income vs Morocco: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Low income
0.2198 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
3.21 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
46th
Morocco rank
47th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Low income
  • Morocco
01234196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 3.21 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2198 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 2.99 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 14.6 times Low income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 46th and Morocco ranks 47th of 47 groups.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0829 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.42 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 0.1263 metric tons per square kilometre 0.634 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5077 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 0.1531 metric tons per square kilometre 1.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8985 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 0.119 metric tons per square kilometre 1.54 metric tons per square kilometre 1.42 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 0.1443 metric tons per square kilometre 2.21 metric tons per square kilometre 2.06 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 0.1702 metric tons per square kilometre 2.93 metric tons per square kilometre 2.76 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 0.2016 metric tons per square kilometre 3.27 metric tons per square kilometre 3.07 metric tons per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Low income or Morocco?
Morocco, at 3.21 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2198 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Low income and Morocco?
2.99 metric tons per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low income and Morocco rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Low income ranks 46th and Morocco ranks 47th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Morocco: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/low-income/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/low-income/morocco/">Low income vs Morocco: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.