Madagascar vs Zimbabwe: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Madagascar
0.2406 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2378 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Madagascar
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0.2406 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2378 metric tons per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0804 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0759 metric tons per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 0.1053 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0114 metric tons per square kilometre 0.094 metric tons per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 0.1305 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0543 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0762 metric tons per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 0.1987 metric tons per square kilometre 0.157 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0417 metric tons per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 0.2355 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2181 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0174 metric tons per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 0.2129 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3224 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1095 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.2124 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2635 metric tons per square kilometre 0.051 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Madagascar or Zimbabwe?
Madagascar, at 0.2406 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2378 metric tons per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Madagascar and Zimbabwe?
0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Zimbabwe rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Madagascar ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Zimbabwe: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/zimbabwe/">Madagascar vs Zimbabwe: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.