Mauritania vs Pakistan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.6616 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
102nd
Pakistan rank
101st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Pakistan
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.6616 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0181 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Mauritania ranks 102nd and Pakistan ranks 101st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1465 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1191 metric tons per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 0.0382 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2588 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2207 metric tons per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.0641 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4542 metric tons per square kilometre 0.39 metric tons per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.0688 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6999 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6312 metric tons per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.1928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6496 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4569 metric tons per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 0.5189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6375 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1185 metric tons per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 0.6811 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6482 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0329 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.6616 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Pakistan?
0.0181 metric tons per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Pakistan rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 102nd and Pakistan ranks 101st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Pakistan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/pakistan/">Mauritania vs Pakistan: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.