Mauritania vs Tunisia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.694 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
102nd
Tunisia rank
99th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Tunisia
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.694 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0505 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 99th of 216 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.162 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1347 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.0382 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2302 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.0641 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5131 metric tons per square kilometre 0.449 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0688 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5525 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4837 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.1928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6463 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4536 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.5189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1738 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.6811 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6878 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0067 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.694 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Tunisia?
0.0505 metric tons per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Tunisia rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 99th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Tunisia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/tunisia/">Mauritania vs Tunisia: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.