Mauritania vs Turkey: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkey
0.59 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
102nd
Turkey rank
105th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Turkey
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.59 metric tons per square kilometre in Turkey, a difference of 0.0535 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Turkey's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turkey ahead.

Mauritania ranks 102nd and Turkey ranks 105th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Turkey Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1638 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1364 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
1970s 0.0382 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2361 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1979 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
1980s 0.0641 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6411 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
1990s 0.0688 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6481 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5793 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
2000s 0.1928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6764 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4837 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
2010s 0.5189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5208 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
2020s 0.6811 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4813 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1999 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Turkey?
Mauritania, at 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.59 metric tons per square kilometre in Turkey as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Turkey?
0.0535 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Turkey?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Turkey rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 102nd and Turkey ranks 105th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Turkey: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/turkiye/">Mauritania vs Turkey: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.