Mexico vs Nigeria: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Mexico
0.9494 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
0.878 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
91st
Nigeria rank
94th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Nigeria
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.9494 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.878 metric tons per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.0714 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 91st and Nigeria ranks 94th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 6 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1468 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0987 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0482 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.2904 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2657 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0247 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.6912 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2851 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4061 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.6849 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3691 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3159 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.7376 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5622 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1754 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.811 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8198 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0088 metric tons per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 0.874 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8707 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Mexico or Nigeria?
Mexico, at 0.9494 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.878 metric tons per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Mexico and Nigeria?
0.0714 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Nigeria rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 91st and Nigeria ranks 94th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Nigeria: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mexico/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mexico/nigeria/">Mexico vs Nigeria: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.