Monaco vs United States: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Monaco
0.4798 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
0.5083 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Monaco rank
118th
United States rank
115th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Monaco
  • United States
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.5083 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4798 metric tons per square kilometre in Monaco, a difference of 0.0285 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Monaco's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United States ahead.

Monaco ranks 118th and United States ranks 115th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Monaco averaged higher in 4 and United States in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco United States Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3453 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3328 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0125 metric tons per square kilometre Monaco
1980s 0.9373 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5144 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4229 metric tons per square kilometre Monaco
1990s 1.38 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5964 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7849 metric tons per square kilometre Monaco
2000s 1.04 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5602 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4758 metric tons per square kilometre Monaco
2010s 0.4933 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5858 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0925 metric tons per square kilometre United States
2020s 0.4832 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5129 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0297 metric tons per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Monaco or United States?
United States, at 0.5083 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4798 metric tons per square kilometre in Monaco as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Monaco and United States?
0.0285 metric tons per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and United States?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Monaco and United States rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Monaco ranks 118th and United States ranks 115th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs United States: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/monaco/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/monaco/united-states/">Monaco vs United States: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.