Namibia vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Namibia
0.4532 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
121st
East Timor rank
123rd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • East Timor
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.4532 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

Namibia ranks 121st and East Timor ranks 123rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 6 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0091 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0091 metric tons per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0211 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0211 metric tons per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.6821 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0229 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6592 metric tons per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.6888 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2357 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4531 metric tons per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.6104 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2988 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3116 metric tons per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.4255 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4389 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0134 metric tons per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Namibia or East Timor?
Namibia, at 0.4532 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Namibia and East Timor?
0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and East Timor rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 121st and East Timor ranks 123rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/namibia/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/namibia/timor-leste/">Namibia vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.