Nauru vs Small states: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Nauru
4,535 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Small states
4.01 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
1st
Small states rank
3rd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Nauru
  • Small states
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 4,535 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.01 metric tons per square kilometre in Small states, a difference of 4,531 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1,131.3 times Small states's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Small states ahead.

Nauru ranks 1st and Small states ranks 3rd of 216 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Small states Difference Ahead
1960s 3.89 metric tons per square kilometre 1.44 metric tons per square kilometre 2.45 metric tons per square kilometre Nauru
1970s 5.6 metric tons per square kilometre 1.79 metric tons per square kilometre 3.81 metric tons per square kilometre Nauru
1980s 7.65 metric tons per square kilometre 2.58 metric tons per square kilometre 5.07 metric tons per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 19.73 metric tons per square kilometre 3.16 metric tons per square kilometre 16.58 metric tons per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 19.24 metric tons per square kilometre 3.82 metric tons per square kilometre 15.43 metric tons per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 225.47 metric tons per square kilometre 3.38 metric tons per square kilometre 222.09 metric tons per square kilometre Nauru
2020s 5,248 metric tons per square kilometre 3.82 metric tons per square kilometre 5,245 metric tons per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Nauru or Small states?
Nauru, at 4,535 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.01 metric tons per square kilometre in Small states as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Nauru and Small states?
4,531 metric tons per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Small states?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Small states rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Nauru ranks 1st and Small states ranks 3rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Small states: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/naoero/small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/naoero/small-states/">Nauru vs Small states: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.