New Zealand vs Rwanda: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

New Zealand
1.24 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
1.37 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
86th
Rwanda rank
84th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Rwanda
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1.37 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.24 metric tons per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.13 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 86th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 216 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1922 metric tons per square kilometre 0.027 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1652 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.2798 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0412 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2385 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.8126 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0492 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7633 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 1.89 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1628 metric tons per square kilometre 1.73 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 1.98 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3349 metric tons per square kilometre 1.65 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 1.64 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8948 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7416 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 1.31 metric tons per square kilometre 1.3 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0111 metric tons per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, New Zealand or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 1.37 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.24 metric tons per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between New Zealand and Rwanda?
0.13 metric tons per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 86th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Rwanda: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/rwanda/">New Zealand vs Rwanda: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.