North America vs Uganda: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

North America
0.2997 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
3.57 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
North America rank
44th
Uganda rank
43rd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • North America
  • Uganda
01234196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 3.57 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2997 metric tons per square kilometre in North America, a difference of 3.27 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 11.9 times North America's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

North America ranks 44th and Uganda ranks 43rd of 47 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North America Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2243 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4219 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1976 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 0.2433 metric tons per square kilometre 0.867 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6237 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 0.3471 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9367 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5896 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 0.3732 metric tons per square kilometre 1.12 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7467 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 0.3554 metric tons per square kilometre 1.66 metric tons per square kilometre 1.3 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 0.3481 metric tons per square kilometre 2.17 metric tons per square kilometre 1.82 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 0.3031 metric tons per square kilometre 2.96 metric tons per square kilometre 2.66 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, North America or Uganda?
Uganda, at 3.57 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2997 metric tons per square kilometre in North America as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between North America and Uganda?
3.27 metric tons per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North America and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do North America and Uganda rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
North America ranks 44th and Uganda ranks 43rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North America vs Uganda: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/north-america/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/north-america/uganda/">North America vs Uganda: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.