Panama vs United Kingdom: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Panama
2.95 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
United Kingdom
2.97 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
53rd
United Kingdom rank
52nd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • United Kingdom
012345196119922023

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 2.97 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.95 metric tons per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.02 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Panama ranks 53rd and United Kingdom ranks 52nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1960s 0.539 metric tons per square kilometre 4.44 metric tons per square kilometre 3.9 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
1970s 1.69 metric tons per square kilometre 4.68 metric tons per square kilometre 2.99 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
1980s 2.26 metric tons per square kilometre 3.62 metric tons per square kilometre 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 2.28 metric tons per square kilometre 3.55 metric tons per square kilometre 1.27 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 3.37 metric tons per square kilometre 2.75 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6201 metric tons per square kilometre Panama
2010s 2.61 metric tons per square kilometre 2.76 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1546 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
2020s 2.87 metric tons per square kilometre 2.69 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1841 metric tons per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Panama or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 2.97 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.95 metric tons per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Panama and United Kingdom?
0.02 metric tons per square kilometre, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and United Kingdom?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and United Kingdom rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 53rd and United Kingdom ranks 52nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs United Kingdom: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/panama/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/panama/united-kingdom/">Panama vs United Kingdom: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.