Puerto Rico vs Singapore: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Puerto Rico
0.2423 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.2423 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
142nd
Singapore rank
141st

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Singapore
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.2423 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2423 metric tons per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 metric tons per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Puerto Rico ranks 142nd and Singapore ranks 141st of 216 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3107 metric tons per square kilometre 20.91 metric tons per square kilometre 20.6 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 0.282 metric tons per square kilometre 25.21 metric tons per square kilometre 24.92 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.2147 metric tons per square kilometre 26.9 metric tons per square kilometre 26.68 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.3259 metric tons per square kilometre 15.23 metric tons per square kilometre 14.91 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.3863 metric tons per square kilometre 5.9 metric tons per square kilometre 5.52 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.1879 metric tons per square kilometre 5.15 metric tons per square kilometre 4.96 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.2102 metric tons per square kilometre 2.36 metric tons per square kilometre 2.15 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Puerto Rico or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.2423 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2423 metric tons per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Puerto Rico and Singapore?
0 metric tons per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Singapore rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Puerto Rico ranks 142nd and Singapore ranks 141st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Singapore: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/singapore/">Puerto Rico vs Singapore: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.