South Africa vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

South Africa
0.4316 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
125th
East Timor rank
123rd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • East Timor
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4316 metric tons per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.005 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 125th and East Timor ranks 123rd of 216 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 1.23 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 1.23 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 1.07 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 1.07 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.8245 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8245 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.4718 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0229 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4489 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.63 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2357 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3943 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0.5206 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2988 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2218 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0.4902 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4389 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0514 metric tons per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, South Africa or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0.4366 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4316 metric tons per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between South Africa and East Timor?
0.005 metric tons per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and East Timor rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 125th and East Timor ranks 123rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/timor-leste/">South Africa vs East Timor: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.