South Asia vs Tuvalu: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

South Asia
2.62 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
1,633 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia rank
4th
Tuvalu rank
2nd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • South Asia
  • Tuvalu
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 1,633 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.62 metric tons per square kilometre in South Asia, a difference of 1,630 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 624.0 times South Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Asia ahead.

South Asia ranks 4th and Tuvalu ranks 2nd of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Asia averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Asia Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5418 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5418 metric tons per square kilometre South Asia
1970s 0.7937 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1937 metric tons per square kilometre South Asia
1980s 0.9187 metric tons per square kilometre 20.72 metric tons per square kilometre 19.8 metric tons per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 1.32 metric tons per square kilometre 19.54 metric tons per square kilometre 18.23 metric tons per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 1.67 metric tons per square kilometre 82.16 metric tons per square kilometre 80.49 metric tons per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 2.18 metric tons per square kilometre 345.73 metric tons per square kilometre 343.55 metric tons per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 2.35 metric tons per square kilometre 1,142 metric tons per square kilometre 1,139 metric tons per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, South Asia or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 1,633 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.62 metric tons per square kilometre in South Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between South Asia and Tuvalu?
1,630 metric tons per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Asia and Tuvalu rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
South Asia ranks 4th and Tuvalu ranks 2nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia vs Tuvalu: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/south-asia/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/south-asia/tuvalu/">South Asia vs Tuvalu: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.