Tanzania vs Palestine: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Tanzania
0.5434 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
0.5411 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania rank
110th
Palestine rank
111th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Tanzania
  • Palestine
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.5434 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5411 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Tanzania ranks 110th and Palestine ranks 111th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 5 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania Palestine Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1227 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1227 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 0.2243 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2243 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 0.3352 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3352 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 0.3877 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2456 metric tons per square kilometre 0.142 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 0.3987 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3757 metric tons per square kilometre 0.023 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 0.4284 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4448 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0164 metric tons per square kilometre Palestine
2020s 0.5384 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6963 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1579 metric tons per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Tanzania or Palestine?
Tanzania, at 0.5434 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5411 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Tanzania and Palestine?
0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Palestine?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tanzania and Palestine rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Tanzania ranks 110th and Palestine ranks 111th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Palestine: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/west-bank-and-gaza/">Tanzania vs Palestine: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.