Venezuela vs Zimbabwe: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Venezuela
0.2091 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2378 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Venezuela rank
148th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Venezuela
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2378 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2091 metric tons per square kilometre in Venezuela, a difference of 0.0287 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Venezuela's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Venezuela ahead.

Venezuela ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Venezuela averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Venezuela Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1249 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1204 metric tons per square kilometre Venezuela
1970s 0.1742 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0114 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1628 metric tons per square kilometre Venezuela
1980s 0.3318 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0543 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2775 metric tons per square kilometre Venezuela
1990s 0.5468 metric tons per square kilometre 0.157 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3897 metric tons per square kilometre Venezuela
2000s 0.5022 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2181 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2841 metric tons per square kilometre Venezuela
2010s 0.2722 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3224 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0502 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.2262 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2635 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0373 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Venezuela or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.2378 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2091 metric tons per square kilometre in Venezuela as of 2023.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Venezuela and Zimbabwe?
0.0287 metric tons per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Venezuela and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Venezuela and Zimbabwe rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Venezuela ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Venezuela vs Zimbabwe: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/venezuela-rb/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/venezuela-rb/zimbabwe/">Venezuela vs Zimbabwe: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.