Africa Eastern and Southern vs Iceland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Africa Eastern and Southern
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iceland
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
14th
Iceland rank
13th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Iceland
00.0010.0020.003196019922024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Iceland's figure about 8.0 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 14th and Iceland ranks 13th of 47 groups.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0021 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.002 metric tons per US$ of GDP Iceland
1970s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0008 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0007 metric tons per US$ of GDP Iceland
1980s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0004 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0004 metric tons per US$ of GDP Iceland
1990s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP Iceland
2000s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP Iceland
2010s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP Iceland
2020s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Africa Eastern and Southern or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Africa Eastern and Southern and Iceland?
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Iceland?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Iceland rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 14th and Iceland ranks 13th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Iceland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/africa-eastern-and-southern/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/africa-eastern-and-southern/iceland/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Iceland: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 14,318 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.