Chile vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Chile
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
33rd
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
36th

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Chile
  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0000196019922024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chile's figure about 7.9 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 33rd and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 36th of 211 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP Chile
1990s 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP Chile
2000s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Chile
2010s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Chile
2020s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Chile or Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Chile, at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Chile and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
37 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2024.
How do Chile and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Chile ranks 33rd and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 36th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Chile vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 14,318 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.