Ecuador vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Ecuador
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ecuador rank
40th
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
42nd

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Ecuador
  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0000196019922024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 20.0 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 38 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 40th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 42nd of 211 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1980s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Ecuador
1990s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2000s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2010s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2020s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Ecuador or Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
Ecuador, at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Ecuador and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
38 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank globally for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Ecuador ranks 40th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 42nd of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/">Ecuador vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 14,318 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.