Central African Republic vs Niger: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Central African Republic
0.0633 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Niger
0.1189 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
192nd
Niger rank
190th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Niger
0.040.060.080.10.12197019972024

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.1189 t CO2e/capita against 0.0633 t CO2e/capita in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0556 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.9 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Niger ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 192nd and Niger ranks 190th of 203 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Niger Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0378 t CO2e/capita 0.0546 t CO2e/capita 0.0168 t CO2e/capita Niger
1980s 0.0612 t CO2e/capita 0.096 t CO2e/capita 0.0348 t CO2e/capita Niger
1990s 0.0606 t CO2e/capita 0.0652 t CO2e/capita 0.0046 t CO2e/capita Niger
2000s 0.0599 t CO2e/capita 0.0608 t CO2e/capita 0.0009 t CO2e/capita Niger
2010s 0.0487 t CO2e/capita 0.1013 t CO2e/capita 0.0526 t CO2e/capita Niger
2020s 0.0635 t CO2e/capita 0.117 t CO2e/capita 0.0535 t CO2e/capita Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Central African Republic or Niger?
Niger, at 0.1189 t CO2e/capita against 0.0633 t CO2e/capita in Central African Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Central African Republic and Niger?
0.0556 t CO2e/capita, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Niger?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Niger rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Central African Republic ranks 192nd and Niger ranks 190th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Niger: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/central-african-republic/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/central-african-republic/niger/">Central African Republic vs Niger: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.