Croatia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Croatia
4.83 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
4.92 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Croatia rank
56th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
55th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Croatia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
02468197019972024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 4.92 t CO2e/capita against 4.83 t CO2e/capita in Croatia, a difference of 0.09 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 56th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 55th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 4.14 t CO2e/capita 0.6136 t CO2e/capita 3.52 t CO2e/capita Croatia
1980s 5.93 t CO2e/capita 0.473 t CO2e/capita 5.46 t CO2e/capita Croatia
1990s 3.94 t CO2e/capita 0.3579 t CO2e/capita 3.59 t CO2e/capita Croatia
2000s 5.14 t CO2e/capita 1.52 t CO2e/capita 3.63 t CO2e/capita Croatia
2010s 4.51 t CO2e/capita 2.66 t CO2e/capita 1.84 t CO2e/capita Croatia
2020s 4.63 t CO2e/capita 4.82 t CO2e/capita 0.1936 t CO2e/capita Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Croatia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 4.92 t CO2e/capita against 4.83 t CO2e/capita in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Croatia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.09 t CO2e/capita, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Croatia ranks 56th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 55th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/croatia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/croatia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Croatia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.